Today our class is taught with the various types of
panel-to-panel transition, and I think it's really amazing. It is something
that I’ve neither thought of nor pay attention to when I read comics.
According to Scott McCloud's, there are 6
categories of panel-to-panel transitions.
And here are the types of transition my group
discussed during lesson with the help of the following pictures provided for
class exercise 2...
TRANSITION 1
[Moment-to-moment]
I guess it's quite obvious the stages progress very
slowly and requires very little closure for us to associate on what is
happening.
TRANSITION 2
TRANSITION 6
[Action-to-action]
The action-to-action transitions feature a single
subject in distinct action-to-action progressions.
I think moment-to-moment and action-to-action is
rather similar but action seems to portray instantly rather than “slow motion”
by identifying every moment. (You can compare the image for Moment with Action)
TRANSITION 3
[Subject-to-subject]
The panels-to-panels still stays within a scene or
an idea, which requires considerably degree of reading involvement to render
these transitions meaningful.
But if you compare action with subject transition,
I think closure is required more for subject transition compared to action.
TRANSITION 4
[Scene-to-scene]
One of the example done with the pictures given for
the exercise, but I'm not really sure if this work correctly. I am trying to
show the transportation in time, from morning to night. I think it's a little
difficult to relate the frames together for a story without text. In this case,
a deductive reasoning is required in reading these transitions, which transport
reader across significant distances of time and space.
This is a proper example from lecture slides by Scott McCloud.
TRANSITION 5
[Aspect-to-aspect]
As for the 5th transition, it normally bypasses
time for the most part and sets a wandering eye on different aspects of a
place, idea or mood. So I gave a different mood for the pictures above, hope
it's right :) This kind of transition seems to be more illustrated for opening
sequence.
[Non Sequitur]
Every frame offers no logical relationship what-so-ever,
and the image above is a very direct example from Scott. :D
No comments:
Post a Comment